Switch to: References

Citations of:

The anthropological foundations of William James's philosophy

In Michael H. DeArmey & Stephen Skousgaard (eds.), The Philosophical psychology of William James. Washington, D.C.: Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology & University Press of America (1986)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Pragmatism, Perspectivism, Anthropology. A Consistent Triad.Pietro Gori - 2017 - Internationales Jahrbuch für Philosophische Anthropologie 7 (1):83-102.
    The paper defends the idea that Jamesian pragmatism, Nietzschean perspectivism, and philosophical anthropology represent a consistent triad, for the similarities and connections between the first two positions rest in their engagement with the anthropological question. As will be argued, a) pragmatism is concerned with anthropology and that it deals with a fundamental issue of Nietzsche’s late thought; b) the problem of the type of man (der Typus Mensch) is involved in Nietzsche’s questioning the value of truth, and perspectivism is an (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • William James and 18th-century anthropology: Holism, scepticism and the doctrine of experience.Jerome Carroll - 2018 - History of the Human Sciences 31 (3):3-20.
    This article discusses the common ground between William James and the tradition of philosophical anthropology. Recent commentators on this overlap have characterised philosophical anthropology as combining science and Kantian teleology, for instance in Kant’s seminal definition of anthropology as being concerned with what the human being makes of itself, as distinct from what attributes it is given by nature. This article registers the tension between Kantian thinking, which reckons to ground experience in a priori categories, and William James’s psychology, which (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations