Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Respect for Human Vulnerability: The Emergence of a New Principle in Bioethics.Henk ten Have - 2015 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 12 (3):395-408.
    Vulnerability has become a popular though controversial topic in bioethics, notably since 2000. As a result, a common body of knowledge has emerged distinguishing between different types of vulnerability, criticizing the categorization of populations as vulnerable, and questioning the practical implications. It is argued that two perspectives on vulnerability, i.e., the philosophical and political, pose challenges to contemporary bioethics discourse: they re-examine the significance of human agency, the primacy of the individual person, and the negativity of vulnerability. As a phenomenon (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • Vulnerability in Research: Individuals with Limited Financial and/or Social Resources.Christine Grady - 2009 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (1):19-27.
    Vulnerability in research is often understood as a diminished ability to protect one's own interests, manifested by a compromised capacity to give informed or voluntary consent. Certain groups of people are thought to be more vulnerable than others and therefore are at risk of being exploited or mistreated in research. Accordingly, the federal regulations call for additional safeguards to protect vulnerable groups.There remains some ambiguity and contradiction, however, regarding what groups are vulnerable in research and why,3 since the available codes (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Vulnerability in Clinical Research with Patients in Pain: A Risk Analysis.Raymond C. Tait - 2009 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (1):59-72.
    The concept of vulnerability has been the topic of considerable discussion in research bioethics, largely because of dissatisfaction with early constructions of the concept that were based on subpopulations of research subjects. These subpopulations have attributes likely to undermine their capacity to provide autonomous informed consent: persons who are relatively or absolutely incapable of protecting their own interests through negotiations for informed consent. Several subpopulations were seen as requiring special protections, including children, pregnant women, prisoners, racial minorities, the economically disadvantaged, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Looking Beyond the Limitations of “Vulnerability”: Reforming Safeguards in Research.Debra A. DeBruin - 2004 - American Journal of Bioethics 4 (3):76-78.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Design and Direction in Research Ethics: A Question of Direction.Chalmers C. Clark - 2004 - American Journal of Bioethics 4 (3):78-80.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark