Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Ethics in Emergency Times: The Case of COVID-19.Stefano Semplici - 2022 - Philosophies 7 (3):70.
    A disaster is an occurrence disrupting a community’s normal functioning and existence. The disruption may render it impossible to comply with principles and to respect, protect, and fulfill rights as it happens in ordinary times; it may induce an overwhelming shortage of resources and make tragic decisions unavoidable. From its very beginning, the COVID-19 pandemic evoked the scenario of disaster medicine, where triage is likely to imply not simply postponing a treatment but letting someone die. However, it is not only (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • On Love, Dying Alone, and Community.Thana C. de Campos-Rudinsky - 2022 - The New Bioethics 28 (3):238-251.
    This paper examines the problem of dying alone in the context of no-visitors hospital policy during the COVID-19 pandemic. It critically analyses a rights-based solution, offering a democratized vi...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Triage, consent and trusting black boxes.Kenneth Boyd - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (5):289-290.
    The coronavirus pandemic has brought to public attention a variety of questions long debated in medical ethics, but now given both added urgency and wider publicity. Among these is triage, with its origins in deciding which individual lives are to be saved on a battlefield, but now also concerned with the allocation of scarce resources more generally. On the historical battlefield, decisions about whom to treat first – neither those who would survive without treatment, nor those who would not survive (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Post-COVID-19 WHO Reform: Ethical Considerations.Thana C. de Campos-Rudinsky - 2021 - Public Health Ethics 14 (2):134-147.
    This study argues against the expansive approach to the WHO reform, according to which to be a better global health leader, WHO should do more, be given more power and financial resources, have more operational capacities, and have more teeth by introducing more coercive monitoring and compliance mechanisms to its IHR. The expansive approach is a political problem, whose root cause lies in ethics: WHO’s political overambition is grounded on WHO’s lack of conceptual clarity on what good leadership means and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark