Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Who whom? Uptake and radical self-silencing.Maximilian De Gaynesford - unknown
    Radical self-silencing is a particular variety of speech act disablement where the subject silences themselves, whether knowingly or not, because of their own faults or deficiencies. The paper starts with some concrete cases and preparatory comments to help orient and motivate the investigation. It then offers a summary analysis, drawing on a small number of basic concepts to identify its five individually necessary and jointly sufficient conditions and discriminating their two basic forms, ‘internalist’ and ‘externalist’. The paper then explicates and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • New directions for the philosophy of poetry.Karen Simecek - 2019 - Philosophy Compass 14 (6).
    This article will introduce readers to current debates in the philosophy of poetry. This includes discussion of the need for a philosophy of poetry as distinct from a philosophy of literature, the (in)compatibility of poetry and philosophy, poetic meaning and interpretation, and poetry in relation to affect, emotion and expressiveness, which opens up discussion of wider forms of poetry from spoken word to signlanguage poetry. The article ends with suggestions for future directions of research in the philosophy of poetry. I (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Uptake in action.Maximilian De Gaynesford - 2017 - In Savas L. Tsohatzidis (ed.), Interpreting J. L. Austin: Critical Essays. Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge University Press.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Samuel Beckett’s humour: attuning philosophy and literary criticism.Michela Bariselli - 2019 - Dissertation, University of Reading
    This thesis explores and describes the comic features of Samuel Beckett’s prose works. It explores fundamental questions about Beckett’s humour. On the one hand, it investigates the nature of humour, and, on the other, it investigates what counts as humour in Beckett. This twofold investigation requires ‘attuning’ philosophy and literary criticism, where questions and tools of each discipline mutually sharpen and refine each other. Chapter 1 evaluates philosophical accounts of humour and identifies Incongruity Theory as the theory offering the best (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark