Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Settling for second best: when should doctors agree to parental demands for suboptimal medical treatment?Tara Nair, Julian Savulescu, Jim Everett, Ryan Tonkens & Dominic Wilkinson - 2017 - Journal of Medical Ethics 43 (12):831-840.
    Background Doctors sometimes encounter parents who object to prescribed treatment for their children, and request suboptimal substitutes be administered instead. Previous studies have focused on parental refusal of treatment and when this should be permitted, but the ethics of requests for suboptimal treatment has not been explored. Methods The paper consists of two parts: an empirical analysis and an ethical analysis. We performed an online survey with a sample of the general public to assess respondents’ thresholds for acceptable harm and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Evaluating the Harm Principle and the Best Interest of the Child: A Case Resolved Using Standard Microeconomics Principles.Douglas O. Stewart & Joseph P. De Marco - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (8):76-78.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Keep It Simple.John J. Paris & Brian M. Cummings - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (8):78-80.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Conflicts Between Parents and Health Professionals About a Child’s Medical Treatment: Using Clinical Ethics Records to Find Gaps in the Bioethics Literature.Rosalind McDougall, Lauren Notini & Jessica Phillips - 2015 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 12 (3):429-436.
    Clinical ethics records offer bioethics researchers a rich source of cases that clinicians have identified as ethically complex. In this paper, we suggest that clinical ethics records can be used to point to types of cases that lack attention in the current bioethics literature, identifying new areas in need of more detailed bioethical work. We conducted an analysis of the clinical ethics records of one paediatric hospital in Australia, focusing specifically on conflicts between parents and health professionals about a child’s (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Overriding parents’ medical decisions for their children: a systematic review of normative literature.Rosalind J. McDougall & Lauren Notini - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (7):448-452.
    This paper reviews the ethical literature on conflicts between health professionals and parents about medical decision-making for children. We present the results of a systematic review which addressed the question ‘when health professionals and parents disagree about the appropriate course of medical treatment for a child, under what circumstances is the health professional ethically justified in overriding the parents’ wishes?’ We identified nine different ethical frameworks that were put forward by their authors as applicable across various ages and clinical scenarios. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   30 citations