Switch to: References

Citations of:

Quantum Logic and Non-Separability

In Jagdish Mehra (ed.), The physicist's conception of nature. Boston,: Reidel. pp. 714--735 (1973)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. (1 other version)Quantum holism: nonseparability as common ground.Jenann Ismael & Jonathan Schaffer - 2020 - Synthese 197 (10):4131-4160.
    Quantum mechanics seems to portray nature as nonseparable, in the sense that it allows spatiotemporally separated entities to have states that cannot be fully specified without reference to each other. This is often said to implicate some form of “holism.” We aim to clarify what this means, and why this seems plausible. Our core idea is that the best explanation for nonseparability is a “common ground” explanation, which casts nonseparable entities in a holistic light, as scattered reflections of a more (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   53 citations  
  • (1 other version)Quantum holism: nonseparability as common ground.Jenann Ismael & Jonathan Schaffer - manuscript
    Quantum mechanics seems to portray nature as nonseparable, in the sense that it allows spatiotemporally separated entities to have states that cannot be fully specified without reference to each other. This is often said to implicate some form of “holism.” We aim to clarify what this means, and why this seems plausible. Our core idea is that the best explanation for nonseparability is a “common ground” explanation, which casts nonseparable entities in a holistic light, as scattered reflections of a more (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   55 citations  
  • The problem of atomism.Heinz Post - 1975 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 26 (1):19-26.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The concepts of influences and of attributes as seen in connection with Bell's theorem.B. D'Espagnat - 1981 - Foundations of Physics 11 (3-4):205-234.
    With regard to the notion of cause—or more generally of influence—the various methods of proof of Bell's theorem do not all have the same bearing. The differences between two of these methods are analyzed, with regard to both their conceptual basis and their conclusions. It is shown that both methods give valuable information but, not too surprisingly, the one that is based on the more detailed and specific definition of the concept of influences, and that makes use of the concept (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations