Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Small cardinals and small Efimov spaces.Will Brian & Alan Dow - 2022 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 173 (1):103043.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • The Consistency Strength of $$\aleph{\omega}$$ and $$\aleph{{\omega}_1}$$ Being Rowbottom Cardinals Without the Axiom of Choice.Arthur W. Apter & Peter Koepke - 2006 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 45 (6):721-737.
    We show that for all natural numbers n, the theory “ZF + DC $_{\aleph_n}$ + $\aleph_{\omega}$ is a Rowbottom cardinal carrying a Rowbottom filter” has the same consistency strength as the theory “ZFC + There exists a measurable cardinal”. In addition, we show that the theory “ZF + $\aleph_{\omega_1}$ is an ω 2-Rowbottom cardinal carrying an ω 2-Rowbottom filter and ω 1 is regular” has the same consistency strength as the theory “ZFC + There exist ω 1 measurable cardinals”. We (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • (1 other version)The covering lemma up to a Woodin cardinal.W. J. Mitchell, E. Schimmerling & J. R. Steel - 1997 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 84 (2):219-255.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   26 citations  
  • The comparison lemma.John R. Steel - forthcoming - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A Characterization of Generalized Příkrý Sequences.Gunter Fuchs - 2005 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 44 (8):935-971.
    A generalization of Příkrý's forcing is analyzed which adjoins to a model of ZFC a set of order type at most ω below each member of a discrete set of measurable cardinals. A characterization of generalized Příkrý generic sequences reminiscent of Mathias' criterion for Příkrý genericity is provided, together with a maximality theorem which states that a generalized Příkrý sequence almost contains every other one lying in the same extension.This forcing can be used to falsify the covering lemma for a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations