- Submit
-
Browse
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- More
Switch to: References
Citations of:
Add citations
You must login to add citations.
|
|
|
Doernberg and Truog (2023) present a thoughtful analysis of the ethical tensions that arise from physicians increasingly occupying “multiple roles in healthcare”1 I take no issue with the classific... |
|
|
Doernberg and Truog (2023) provide an insightful analysis of the role of medical professionals in what they call spheres of morality. While their framework is useful for inquiring into the moral de... |
|
|
In depicting five “spheres of morality” occupied by physicians Doernberg and Troug provide an impressive analysis on physicians’ various commitments and role conflicts which are excellently illustr... |
|
|
I heartily agree with Sam Doernberg and Robert Troug’s claims that there are important differences between “general morality” and medical ethics, and that in some instances they issue contradictory... |
|
|
In their compelling argument for the use of role morality as a means to aid physicians in navigating potential conflicts of interest, Doernberg and Truog (2023) posit the existence of distinct sphe... |
|
|
Physicians participate in several kinds of activities in their professional lives. Clinical care is the core function of the physician. Medical education is overwhelmingly oriented toward this func... |
|
|
The article by Doernberg and Truog (2023) suggests that five different medical spheres have five distinctive sets of moral norms based on the ends of those spheres, implying that different roles in... |
|
|
Since physicians began to formally professionalize in the 19th century, we have sought to set ourselves apart from other occupations through the adoption (and variable enforcement) of codes of ethi... |
|
|
Doernberg and Truog (2023) claim that physicians increasingly serve in multiple roles outside the traditional clinical encounter, roles with various and divergent aims that nonetheless “invoke the... |
|
|
With their target article, “Spheres of Morality…,” Dornberg and Truog (2023) have given us a careful analytic framework for distinguishing moral concerns among different domains involved in medical... |
|
|
In a recent paper, Doernberg and Truog identify that physicians must routinely navigate a set of distinct “moral spheres”—clinical care, research, population health and the market.1 While the conce... |
|
|
In their target article, Doernberg and Truog (2023) correctly recognize that the doctor-patient relationship is considered a “fiduciary” relationship (i.e., other-regarding rather than self-interes... |
|
|
Why should we obey the rules that constitute a code of conduct? If a rule is justified by conclusive moral reasons, then those reasons are sufficient, from a rational point of view (rather than, sa... |
|
|
Doernberg and Truog (2023) propose a complex scheme for identifying the ethical issues at stake in various medical situations.The complexity of their scheme illustrates the difficulties that arise... |
|
|
Doernberg and Truog (2023) offer a “spheres of morality framework” (11) to illuminate ethical conflicts and improve ethical decision making in healthcare. A sphere of morality is the collection of... |
|
|
Pro Doernberg and Truog (2023), we recognize and acknowledge five spheres of morality in medicine. We posit that these spheres represent domains of practical engagement, which, as the authors note,... |
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-9b866bbb8-rpllx uwo