Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Reorienting Clifford’s evidentialism: returning to social trust.Ian MacDonald - forthcoming - British Journal for the History of Philosophy:1-22.
    Reading W.K. Clifford’s “The Ethics of Belief” in evidentialist terms is standard. However, evidentialist accounts face several longstanding interpretive issues over the Shipowner Story and Clifford’s Motto. This article defends an evidentialist reading. But what distinguishes it from others is that it interprets “The Ethics of Belief” according to Clifford’s “first principle of natural ethics”, a principle he articulates in prior writings, and which comes down to social trust. I reorient Clifford’s evidentialism by returning to his core moral principle and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (21 other versions)مطهری و اخلاق باور.مجید ملایوسفی, احمد ‌اله‌یاری & مریم اسکندری - 2012 - حکمت معاصر 3 (1):119-140.
    اصطلاح «اخلاق باور» برای اولین بار در مقالة معروف کلیفورد، با همین عنوان، به سال 1876 به‌کار رفت. طبق بیان کلیفورد، که بعدها به قاعده یا اصل کلیفورد مشهور شد، «همیشه، همه‌جا، و برای هرکس خطاست که بر اساس قرائن ناکافی به چیزی معتقد شود». از زمانی که کلیفورد این بحث را مطرح کرده است، تاکنون، مورد مناقشات فراوانی بوده است؛ مسئلة اصلی که در پس همة این مناقشات مطرح بوده است این است که آیا اصولاً باورهای آدمی در اختیار (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Honesty and inquiry: W.K. Clifford’s ethics of belief.Nikolaj Nottelmann & Patrick Fessenbecker - 2020 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 28 (4):797-818.
    ABSTRACTW.K. Clifford is widely known for his emphatic motto that it is wrong, always everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence. In fact, that dictum and Clifford’s...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • The philosophy of religion: A programmatic overview.John Bishop - 2006 - Philosophy Compass 1 (5):506–534.
    It is argued that philosophy of religion should focus not only on the epistemic justifiability of holding religious beliefs but also on the moral justifiability of commitment to their truth in practical reasoning. If the truth of classical theism may turn out to be evidentially ambiguous, then pressure is placed on the moral evidentialist assumption that one is morally justified in taking a theistic truth-claim to be true only if one's total evidence sufficiently supports its truth. After investigating some contemporary (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations