Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Engineering Disputed Concepts and the Meeting of Minds.Davide Coraci & Piero Avitabile - forthcoming - Topoi:1-13.
    Critical discussions can often require conceptual engineering, a process in which speakers are engaged in revising each other’s concepts. We show that the analysis of conceptual engineering can benefit from integrating argumentation theory with models of conceptual representation. Argumentation theory accounts for the argumentative moves of the discussants, allowing the detection of speakers’ conceptual disagreements, for which some fallacies can be seen as cues. Models of conceptual representation, such as Conceptual spaces and the theory of meeting of minds, allow us (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Naturalness, Scientific Concepts, and the Substantivity of Social Metaphysics.Igor Douven - forthcoming - Philosophia:1-15.
    We argue that concepts from the social sciences can be as natural as those from physics and chemistry, thereby answering in the positive the question of whether social metaphysics is or can be substantive. The argument takes as a starting point Douven & Gärdenfors’ (Mind & Language, 35, 313–334 2020) optimality account of natural concepts, according to which natural concepts are represented by the cells of an optimally partitioned similarity space. While the account applies straightforwardly to perceptual concepts, it does (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark