Switch to: References

Citations of:

Four philosophies of technology

In Craig Hanks (ed.), Technology and values: essential readings. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 26--37 (2010)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Technological semantics and technological practice: Lessons from an enigmatic episode in twentieth-century technology studies.Kelvin W. Willoughby - 2004 - Knowledge, Technology & Policy 17 (3):11-43.
    This paper is a review of words and their meanings in the field of technology studies, and an analysis the semantics of an idealistic international technology-related social movement that flourished briefly during the second half of the twentieth century. Sloppy nomenclature employed by proponents and observers of the movement led to people with opposite views appearing to agree (and vice versa), with the consequence that the movement’s valuable policy insights exerted only marginal influence on mainstream technology policy. I conclude that (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Transportation Planning for Automated Vehicles—Or Automated Vehicles for Transportation Planning?Shane Epting - 2019 - Essays in Philosophy 20 (2):189-205.
    In recent years, philosophical examinations of automated vehicles have progressed far beyond initial concerns over the ethical decisions that pertain to programming in the event of a crash. In turn, this paper moves in that direction, focusing on the motivations behind efforts to implement driverless vehicles into urban settings. The author argues that the many perceived benefits of these technologies yield a received view of automated vehicles. This position holds that driverless vehicles can solve most if not all urban mobility (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The Functional Complexity of Scientific Evidence.Matthew J. Brown - 2015 - Metaphilosophy 46 (1):65-83.
    This article sketches the main features of traditional philosophical models of evidence, indicating idealizations in such models that it regards as doing more harm than good. It then proceeds to elaborate on an alternative model of evidence that is functionalist, complex, dynamic, and contextual, a view the author calls dynamic evidential functionalism (DEF). This alternative builds on insights from philosophy of scientific practice, Kuhnian philosophy of science, pragmatist epistemology, philosophy of experimentation, and functionalist philosophy of mind. Along the way, the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark