Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Syntax, strategies, and the single case: a reply to Zurif.Judit Druks & John C. Marshall - 1996 - Cognition 58 (2):281-287.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Grammatical theory and the study of sentence comprehension in aphasia: comments on Druks and Marshall.Edgar B. Zurif - 1996 - Cognition 58 (2):271-279.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Could grammatical encoding and grammatical decoding be subserved by the same processing module?Gerard Kempen - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):38-39.
    Grodzinsky interprets linguistic differences between agrammatic comprehension and production symptoms as supporting the hypothesis that the mechanisms underlying grammatical encoding (sentence formulation) and grammatical decoding (syntactic parsing) are at least partially distinct. This inference is shown to be premature. A range of experimentally established similarities between the encoding and decoding processes is highlighted, testifying to the viability of the hypothesis that receptive and productive syntactic tasks are performed by the same syntactic processor.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Language deficits, localization, and grammar: Evidence for a distributive model of language breakdown in aphasic patients and neurologically intact individuals.Frederic Dick, Elizabeth Bates, Beverly Wulfeck, Jennifer Aydelott Utman, Nina Dronkers & Morton Ann Gernsbacher - 2001 - Psychological Review 108 (4):759-788.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations