Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. AI Assistants and the Paradox of Internal Automaticity.William A. Bauer & Veljko Dubljević - 2019 - Neuroethics 13 (3):303-310.
    What is the ethical impact of artificial intelligence assistants on human lives, and specifically how much do they threaten our individual autonomy? Recently, as part of forming an ethical framework for thinking about the impact of AI assistants on our lives, John Danaher claims that if the external automaticity generated by the use of AI assistants threatens our autonomy and is therefore ethically problematic, then the internal automaticity we already live with should be viewed in the same way. He takes (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • Lost in Interpretation: Autonomy and What Patients Tell Versus What Is Inferred.Veljko Dubljević - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (9):28-30.
    The authors interpret the data to mean that patients think that their physicians should make relevant decisions in Learning Health System based trials, and label that as being of 'utmost importance'. However, the patients themselves (in the excerpts provided) emphasize that trust in physicians is instrumental for obtaining protection of patient's bests interests (which seems to be of utmost importance for patients). Furthermore, the perceived bias regarding outcome certainty deserves more discussion. Namely, the decision to defer to physician's opinion is (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • On Changes and Opportunities at AJOB Neuroscience.Veljko Dubljevic - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (1):1-2.
    As the new Editor-in-Chief (EiC) of the AJOB Neuroscience, I am aware that I have some very large shoes to fill. Paul Root Wolpe, who established the quality of the journal and served in that posit...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Bodily Felt Freedom: an Ethical Perspective on Positive Aspects of Deep Brain Stimulation.Julia Sophia Voigt - 2018 - Neuroethics 14 (1):45-57.
    The critical aspects of deep brain stimulation are usually the focus of the ethical debate about the implantation of electrodes into the brain of patients with Parkinson’s disease. Above all, potential postoperative side effects on personality caused by DBS mark the debate. However, rehabilitation of agility and mobility by DBS can be posited against critical aspects. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to emphasize the hitherto neglected positive aspects of that technology. A detailed study of the rehabilitation of controlled (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark