Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Die Verteidigung des Logizismus: Carnaps Versuch von 1930.Adrian Frey - 2012 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 15 (1):417-438.
    According to Carnap an account of the nature of mathematics, both pure and applied, must include the thesis that mathematical truths are devoid of factual content. He first formulated this thesis around 1930 and in its defence attempted to combine the reduction of mathematics to logic undertaken in the Principia with Wittgenstein’s insights into the nature of logic. In this paper I will show that this synthesis faces serious difficulties. Thus, it plays, with good reason, no longer a role in (...)
    Download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Carl Hempel: Whose Philosopher?Nikolay Milkov - 2013 - In N. Milkov & V. Peckhaus (eds.), The Berlin Group and the Philosophy of Logical Empiricism. Springer, pp. 293-308. pp. 293--309.
    Recently, Michael Friedman has claimed that virtually all the seeds of Hempel’s philosophical development trace back to his early encounter with the Vienna Circle (Friedman 2003, 94). As opposed, however, to Friedman’s view of the principal early influences on Hempel, we shall see that those formative influences originated rather with the Berlin Group. Hempel, it is true, spent the fall term of 1929 as a student at the University of Vienna, and, thanks to a letter of recommendation from Hans Reichenbach, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Shaping the Enemy: Foundational Labelling by L.E.J. Brouwer and A. Heyting.Miriam Franchella - 2018 - History and Philosophy of Logic 40 (2):152-181.
    The use of the three labels to denote the three foundational schools of the early twentieth century are now part of literature. Yet, neither their number nor the...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark