Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Benefiting From Wrongdoing and Moral Protest.Sigurd Lindstad - 2021 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 24 (3):753-765.
    Some normative theorists believe that there is a principled moral reason not to retain benefits realized by injustice or wrongdoing. However, critics have argued that this idea is implausible. One purported problem is that the idea lacks an obvious rationale and that attempts to provide one have been unconvincing. This paper articulates and defends the idea that the principled reason in question has an expressive quality: it gets its reason-giving force from the symbolic aptness of such an act as an (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Who Should Intervene?Fredrik Hjorthen - 2017 - Res Publica 23 (4):391-407.
    The objective of this paper is to develop a novel account of how the duty to undertake humanitarian intervention should be assigned to states. It takes as its point of departure two worries about the best existing answer to this question, namely: that it is insensitive to historical considerations, and that its distribution is unfair. Against this background I propose that the duty to intervene should be assigned to states based on the strength of their claim to reject the burden (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Why Victims of Unjust Harm Should Take Priority Over Victims of Bad Luck.Goran Duus-Otterström & Edward Page - forthcoming - .
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark