Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Sex and Circumcision.Brian D. Earp - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (2):43-45.
    What are the effects of circumcision on sexual function and experience? And what does sex—in the sense related to gender—have to do with the ethics of circumcision? Jacobs and Arora (2015) give short shrift to the first of these questions; and they do not seem to have considered the second. In this commentary, I explore the relationship between sex (in both senses) and infant male circumcision, and draw some conclusions about the ongoing debate regarding this controversial practice.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • ‘It’s Not Worse Than Eating Them’: The Limits of Analogy in Bioethics.Julian J. Koplin - 2020 - Monash Bioethics Review 38 (2):129-145.
    Bioethicists often defend novel practices by drawing analogies with practices that we are already familiar with and currently tolerate. If some novel practice is less bad than some widely-accepted practice, then we cannot rightly reject it. Using the bioethics literature on xenotransplantation and interspecies blastocyst complementation as a case study, I show how this style of argument can go awry. The key problem is that our moral intuitions about familiar practices can be distorted by their seeming normality. When considering the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • In Defence of Genital Autonomy for Children.Brian D. Earp - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (3):158-163.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Cutting Both Ways: On the Ethical Entanglements of Human Rights, Rites, and Genital Mutilation.Sarah Burgess & Stuart J. Murray - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (2):50-51.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations