Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Towards a genealogy of pharmacological practice.Ricardo Camargo & Nicolás Ried - 2016 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 19 (1):85-94.
    Following Foucault’s work on disciplinary power and biopolitics, this article maps an initial cartography of the research areas to be traced by a genealogy of pharmacological practice. Pharmacology, as a practical activity, refers to the creation, production and sale of drugs/medication. This work identifies five lines of research that, although often disconnected from each other, may be observed in the specialized literature: pharmaceuticalization; regulation of the pharmaceutical industry; the political-economic structure of the pharmaceutical industry; consumption/consumerism of medications; and bio-knowledge. The (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Does Consumer Engagement in Health Technology Assessment Enhance or Undermine Equity?Narcyz Ghinea, Wendy Lipworth & Ian Kerridge - 2020 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 17 (1):87-94.
    Consumer engagement in decisions about the funding of medicines is often framed as a good in and of itself and as an activity that should be universally encouraged. A common justification for calls for consumer engagement is that it enhances equity. In this paper we systematically critique this assumption. We show that consumer engagement may undermine equity as well as enhance it and show that a simple relationship cannot be assumed but must be justified and demonstrated. In concluding, we present (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Citizen Science for Biomedical Research and Contributive Justice.Cristian Timmermann - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (8):60-62.
    Engaging citizens in science projects has a number of epistemic benefits in terms of improving scientific out- comes and adjusting research to develop innovative solu- tions that are likelier to be used. Yet the emphasis on the epistemic benefits of citizen science projects and its risks, such as exploitation and a lack of benefit-sharing, a fail- ure to sufficiently inform participants of possible hazards and privacy issues, and unacknowledged authorship, which we can find in Wiggins and Wilbanks (2019), should not (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Citizen Science and the Politicization of Epistemology.Narcyz Ghinea - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (8):58-60.
    Wiggins and Wilbanks (2019) present citizen science as a range of “models” that fall under the rubric of public participation. They seem to have accepted what they call the “‘populist rhetoric’ tha...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation