Switch to: References

Citations of:

From Ideal Model of Critical Discussion to Situated Argumentative Discourse: The Step-by-Step Development of the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation

In Scott Jacobs, Sally Jackson, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag (2015)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. (1 other version)Argumentation Theory and Argumentative Practices: A Vital but Complex Relationship.Frans H. van Eemeren - 2018 - Informal Logic 38 (1):322-350.
    To illustrate the development of argumentation theory, the paper traces the journey of the pragma-dialectical theory as it widened its scope, step by step, from an abstract model of critical discussion to the complexities of actual argumentative discourse. It describes how, having contextualized, empiricalized and formalized their approach, pragma-dialecticians are now putting the theory’s analytical instruments to good use in identifying prototypical argumentative patterns in specific communicative activity types in the various communicative domains. This means that they can now start (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • On the Objectivity of Norms of Argumentation.Hoppmann Michael - unknown
    This paper addresses the relationship between norms of reasoning and norms of politeness: To what extend can one be polite and reasonable at the same time? For this purpose, a normative system of reasoning is contrasted with a normative system of politeness. If and when they are in conflict: How can the communicator solve this tension?
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Commentary on Michael Hoppmann’s On the objectivity of Norms of Argumentation.Bart Garssen - unknown
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark