Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Daring to disturb the universe: Heidegger’s authenticity and The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock.Dominic Griffiths - 2009 - Literator 30 (2):107-126.
    In Heidegger’s Being and Time certain concepts are discussed which are central to the ontological constitution of Dasein. This paper demonstrates the interesting manner in which some of these concepts can be used in a reading of T.S. Eliot’s The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock. A comparative analysis is performed, explicating the relevant Heideggerian terms and then relating them to Eliot’s poem. In this way strong parallels are revealed between the two men’s respective thoughts and distinct modernist sensibilities. Prufrock, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Alexius meinong.Johann Marek - 2009 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   22 citations  
  • I will tell you about Axel hägerström: His ontology and theory of judgment.Enrico Pattaro - 2010 - Ratio Juris 23 (1):123-156.
    In this paper I set out to read Hägerström through his own eyes, adhering to the terminology he uses in his own original work and attempting to make sense of the variance and uniformity alike that one finds in his linguistic usage. The translations we have of Hägerström's works are quite liberal, using the same word in English where the original uses different ones, and, vice versa, using different words in English where the original uses a single one in different (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Something still more exact’: T. S. Eliot's ’traditional claims.Elizabeth Beaumont Bissell - 1997 - Angelaki 2 (2):113 – 127.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • (1 other version)Die Verwüstung der Religion durch die Anarchie des Gefühls T. S. Eliot und das Problem des Solipsismus.Eckart Goebel - 1997 - Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift für Literaturwissenschaft Und Geistesgeschichte 71 (3):518-532.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark