Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Addressing the Specificity of Social Concepts: Rickert, Weber, and the Dual contrast Theory.Arnaud Dewalque - unknown
    In this chapter, it is argued that Weber's particular combination of Von Kries' naturalistic paradigm and Rickert's antinaturalistic paradigm might become less puzzling if we return to the interpretation that emerged in the middle of the nineteen-twenties within the South-Western School of neo-Kantianism. The basic intuition which underlies this interpretation is that the social sciences are best understood as generalizing cultural sciences. On this understanding, they differ both from the natural sciences and the historical sciences.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Max Weber’s Methodology and the Comparative Sociology of Religion.Sven Eliaeson - 2016 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 276 (2):253-272.
    Max Weber’s methodology is often treated by some as his principal contribution to social science, while his comparative sociology of religion starting with the famous Calvinist thesis is the Schwerpunkt in his work, according to others. There are several reasons to locate and analyze the conjunctions between these two interpretations. Weber’s ideal type is formulated in several places, not only in the so-called ‘Objectivity’ essay from 1904, but also for instance in the marginal utility-essay from 1908. His three meta-texts for (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark