Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. A “Slice of Cheese”—a Deterrence-Based Argument for the International Criminal Court.Jakob von Holtermann - 2010 - Human Rights Review 11 (3):289-315.
    Over the last decade, theorists have persistently criticised the assumption that the International Criminal Court (ICC) can produce a noteworthy deterrent effect. Consequently, consensus has emerged that we should probably look for different ways to justify the ICC or else abandon the prestigious project entirely. In this paper, I argue that these claims are ill founded and rest primarily on misunderstandings as to the idea of deterrence through punishment. They tend to overstate both the epistemic certainty as to and the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The end of 'the end of impunity'? The international criminal court and the challenge from truth commissions.Jakob vH Holtermann - 2010 - Res Publica 16 (2):209-225.
    With its express intention ‘to put an end to impunity’, the International Criminal Court (ICC) faces a substantial challenge in the shape of conditional amnesties granted in future national truth commissions (TCs)—a challenge that invokes fundamental considerations of criminal justice ethics. In this article, I give an account of the challenge, and I consider a possible solution to it presented by Declan Roche. According to this solution the ICC-prosecutor should respect national amnesties and prosecute and punish only those perpetrators who (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • A “Slice of Cheese”—a Deterrence-Based Argument for the International Criminal Court.Jakob von Holderstein Holtermann - 2010 - Human Rights Review 11 (3):289-315.
    Over the last decade, theorists have persistently criticised the assumption that the International Criminal Court (ICC) can produce a noteworthy deterrent effect. Consequently, consensus has emerged that we should probably look for different ways to justify the ICC or else abandon the prestigious project entirely. In this paper, I argue that these claims are ill founded and rest primarily on misunderstandings as to the idea of deterrence through punishment. They tend to overstate both the epistemic certainty as to and the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark