Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. A Response to G. Scott Davis.Melvin Endy - 2019 - Journal of Religious Ethics 47 (2):425-434.
    This defense of my essay on Vitoria and Suárez argues that my use of the term “religious war” is based on religious authority at least as much as religious cause, and that Davis’s decision to discuss only Vitoria limits his ability to come to terms with my thesis. To Davis’s argument that for Vitoria war was justified against the Indians only as a necessity of simple justice and to protect the innocent, I argue that his disjunction between simple justice and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • How Shall We Read the History of Ethics?G. Scott Davis - 2019 - Journal of Religious Ethics 47 (2):417-424.
    This response suggests that in writing the history of ethics, it is important to take seriously what the principals wrote and believed, distinguishing it carefully from our own responses to their writings, or from subsequent uses to which their writings may have been put. For example, when reading Thomas Aquinas and Francisco de Vitoria on just war against non‐Christian peoples, forcible conversion and conquest are clearly condemned. Whatever the attitudes of their contemporaries, not to mention later thinkers up to the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Reclaiming “Natural Partnership and Communication”.Brett O’Neill - 2022 - Journal of Religious Ethics 50 (1):103-122.
    Journal of Religious Ethics, Volume 50, Issue 1, Page 103-122, March 2022.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark