Switch to: References

Citations of:

Essay Review

[author unknown]
Annals of Science 60 (1):85-94 (2003)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Science as Labor.Wolfgang Lefèvre - 2005 - Perspectives on Science 13 (2):194-225.
    The article takes the term "technoscience" literally and investigates a conception of science that takes it not only as practice, but as production in the sense of a material labor process. It will explore in particular the material connection between science and ordinary production. It will furthermore examine how the historical development of science as a social enterprise was shaped by its technoscientific character. In this context, in an excursus, the prevailing notion will be questioned that social relations must be (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Again, what the philosophy of biology is not.Werner Callebaut - 2005 - Acta Biotheoretica 53 (2):93-122.
    There are many things that philosophy of biology might be. But, given the existence of a professional philosophy of biology that is arguably a progressive research program and, as such, unrivaled, it makes sense to define philosophy of biology more narrowly than the totality of intersecting concerns biologists and philosophers (let alone other scholars) might have. The reasons for the success of the “new” philosophy of biology remain poorly understood. I reflect on what Dutch and Flemish, and, more generally, European (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • Edgar Zilsel’s Politically Engaged Philosophy of Science (1916–1932).Donata Romizi - 2024 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 14 (2):323-360.
    In this article, I aim to show the substantial ways in which Edgar Zilsel can be considered to have been a politically engaged philosopher of science and provide a reconstruction of his philosophical work in the time before his forced emigration to the United States. In line with Monika Wulz and with my own reconstruction of the Vienna Circle’s political engagement, I reject Oliver Schlaudt’s 2018 thesis according to which Zilsel cannot be considered a politically engaged philosopher of science. My (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark