Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Experiments at the margins: Ethics and transgression in cinema science.Fran Pheasant-Kelly - 2015 - Thesis Eleven 131 (1):28-43.
    Science is a discipline defined by empiricism and reliable methodologies that result in predictable outcomes. Yet, cutting-edge experiments inevitably involve an element of the unknown, an aspect which science fiction exploits for dramatic effect. Furthermore, fictional science is freed from the ethical constraints that regulate real-world experimentation and is therefore often transgressive. Even as films capitalize on unethical practices and cutting-edge scenarios for dramatic and commercial reasons, the origin of the filmmaker and/or place of production may affect a film’s content. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (1 other version)Why should I read histories of science? A response to Patricia Fara, Steve Fuller and Joseph Rouse.Mark Erickson - 2010 - History of the Human Sciences 23 (4):68-91.
    History of science is, we are told, an important subject for study. Its rise in recent years to become a ‘stand alone’ discipline has been mirrored by an expansion of popular history of science texts available in bookstores. Given this, it is perhaps surprising that little attention has been given to how history of science is written. This article attempts to do that through constructing a typology of histories of science based upon a consideration of audiences who read these texts (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The usual suspects: Richard Dawkins : The Oxford book of modern science writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009, xviii+419 pp, £9.99 PB.Mark Erickson - 2010 - Metascience 20 (2):317-320.
    The usual suspects Content Type Journal Article DOI 10.1007/s11016-010-9453-9 Authors Mark Erickson, School of Applied Social Science, University of Brighton, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9PH UK Journal Metascience Online ISSN 1467-9981 Print ISSN 0815-0796.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (1 other version)Why should I read histories of science? A response to Patricia Fara, Steve Fuller and Joseph Rouse.Mark Erickson - 2010 - History of the Human Sciences 23 (4):105-108.
    History of science is, we are told, an important subject for study. Its rise in recent years to become a ‘stand alone’ discipline has been mirrored by an expansion of popular history of science texts available in bookstores. Given this, it is perhaps surprising that little attention has been given to how history of science is written. This article attempts to do that through constructing a typology of histories of science based upon a consideration of audiences who read these texts (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation