Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Accounting Ethics and the Fragmentation of Value.Céline Baud, Marion Brivot & Darlene Himick - 2019 - Journal of Business Ethics 168 (2):373-387.
    This study investigates how one important accounting professional authority—CPA Canada—discusses accounting ethics and exhorts its members to think about ethics-related issues. To do this, we rely on empirical evidence of the types of arguments used by CPA Canada to describe what they consider acceptable moral justifications in a variety of practical situations that accountants may encounter. We argue that the articles contained in the profession’s primary publication for all members, CPA Magazine, offer a wealth of such evidence. We analyze 237 (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Building Ethical Narratives: The Audiences for AICPA Editorials.Dean Neu & Gregory D. Saxton - 2022 - Journal of Business Ethics 182 (4):1055-1072.
    This study examines how the American Institute of Certified Professional Accountants (AICPA) uses character and concept words to communicate normative narratives to different internal audiences. Our analysis of 552 editorials published in the AICPA’s Journal of Accountancy during the 1916–1973 period illustrates how the AICPA communicated similar yet different normative narratives to firm partners and students. During this time period, the centrality of ethically infused words such as ethics, conduct, and independence not only varied across different time periods but also (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Debating Ethics or Risks? An Exploratory Study of Audit Partners’ Peer Consultations About Ethics.Mouna Hazgui & Marion Brivot - 2020 - Journal of Business Ethics 175 (4):741-758.
    This qualitative field study is based on interviews with 20 experienced audit partners in France and documents the dialogical dimension of ethical deliberation in auditing. We ask: do audit partners consult each other when faced with an ethical dilemma at work? Who among their peers do they prefer to consult and why? Our analysis provides evidence that audit partners do not deliberate alone, contrary to what psychological experimental research on audit ethics usually postulates. When faced with an uncertain situation in (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation