Switch to: References

Citations of:

Is There an Ethical Upper Limit on Risks to Study Participants?

Nir Eyal

Public Health Ethics 13 (2):143-156 (2020)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.

The Normative Power of Consent and Limits on Research Risks.Aaron Eli Segal & David S. Wendler - 2024 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 27 (4).details Research regulations around the world do not impose any limits on the risks to which consenting adults may be exposed. Nonetheless, most review committees regard some risks as too high, even for consenting adults. To justify this practice, commentators have appealed to a range of considerations which are external to informed consent and the risks themselves. Most prominently, some argue that exposing consenting adults to very high risks has the potential to undermine public trust in research. This justification assumes that (...) Download Export citation Bookmark
A trilemma for the lexical utility model of the precautionary principle.H. Orri Stefánsson - forthcoming - Philosophical Studies:1-17.details Bartha and DesRoches (2021) and Steel and Bartha (2023) argue that we should understand the precautionary principle as the injunction to maximise lexical utilities. They show that the lexical utility model has important pragmatic advantages. Moreover, the model has the theoretical advantage of satisfying all axioms of expected utility theory except continuity. In this paper I raise a trilemma for any attempt at modelling the precautionary principle with lexical utilities: it permits choice cycles or leads to paralysis or implies that (...) Download Export citation Bookmark 1 citation

1