Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Revisiting Gender-Inclusive God-Talk.J. Aaron Simmons & Mason Marshall - 2008 - Philosophy and Theology 20 (1-2):243-263.
    Though academic debate over gender-inclusive God-talk seems to have fizzled, the issue is a pressing one within many Christiandenominations today—both within and outside the Church—and for that reason deserves to be briefly revisited. Accordingly, althoughin this essay we approach the issue as professional philosophers, our focus is on the life of the Church—more specifically, those no doubt sizable segments of the Church for which a personal God and Satan exist and evangelism matters. Running an elimination argument, we contend that if (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The threat of logical inversion and our need for philosophical attention: from thought-expression to discourse and discussion.Brandon Yarbrough - 2018 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 83 (1):21-39.
    Thought-expressions are not simply good; instead, they become good for us when they make sense, empower action, and support health. From time to time, we may need to consider the difference between thought-expression and discourse, or thought-expression that really makes sense, and the difference between discourse and discussion, or a discourse-situation that makes genuine agreement or disagreement possible for us. In this essay, I explore a problem that D. Z. Phillips and Randy Ramal have termed “logical inversion,” and I argue (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • N.A. Berdyaev and M. Scheler: Philosophical and Anthropological Approaches to the Problem of Theodicy.Kirill A. Martemianov - 2020 - Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences 63 (8):143-159.
    The article considers the approaches to theodicy’s problem of Russian and German philosophers with clear religious orientation: Nikolai Alexandrovich Berdyaev and Max Scheler. However, for more explicit insight into our topic we found, the article provides the general overview of theodicy tradition. Standpoints of these thinkers living in different epochs are linked by the steady belief in a reasonability of the world created by God. The main obstacle to acceptance of this argumentation is the problem of evil’s existence. The way (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Rape and Spiritual Death.Gina Messina-Dysert - 2012 - Feminist Theology 20 (2):120-132.
    Rape is a form of violence that causes destructive consequences to both the physical and spiritual health of women. Due to its taboo nature as well as the societal response to the victim, rape is especially harmful and results in han, a Korean concept that signifies a compressed suffering. The continual torment caused by han damages the rape victim’s spiritual health and ultimately leads to spiritual death. This article offers a definition of spiritual death and explores how the experience of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Christian Perspectives on Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia: The Anglican Tradition.Cynthia B. Cohen - 1996 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 24 (4):369-379.
    We have always had the ability to commit suicide or request euthanasia in times of serious illness. Yet these acts have been prohibited by the Christian tradition from early times. Some Christians, as they see relatives and friends kept alive too long and in poor condition through the use of current medical powers, however, are beginning to question that tradition. Are assisted suicide and euthanasia compassionate Christian responses to those in pain and suffering who face death? Or are they ways (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • From the Aesthetic Theme to the Aesthetic Myth: a Reflection on the Trinitarian God’s Connection to Nature and the Problem of Evil.Ionut Untea - 2022 - Sophia 61 (4):839-868.
    The article begins with a reflection on the ‘conversation between mythologies’ present in the debate between C. Robert Mesle and John Hick on the role of Irenaean theodicy and process theology to tackle convincingly the problem of evil in the contemporary and future context of scientific advancement. I argue that, although these two authors consider their mythological perspectives to be widely different, there is a possibility of advancing toward conciliating the two views. I call the resulting myth the ‘aesthetic myth,’ (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark