Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Inductive confirmation, counterfactual conditionals, and laws of nature.Marc Lange - 1996 - Philosophical Studies 85 (1):1-36.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Does Meta-induction Justify Induction: Or Maybe Something Else?J. Brian Pitts - 2023 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 54 (3):393-419.
    According to the Feigl–Reichenbach–Salmon–Schurz pragmatic justification of induction, no predictive method is guaranteed or even likely to work for predicting the future; but if anything will work, induction will work—at least when induction is employed at the meta-level of predictive methods in light of their track records. One entertains a priori all manner of esoteric prediction methods, and is said to arrive a posteriori at the conclusion, based on the actual past, that object-level induction is optimal. Schurz’s refinements largely solve (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Postulates of rational preference.Alex C. Michalos - 1967 - Philosophy of Science 34 (1):18-22.
    The postulates of rational preference suggested by Von Neumann and Morgenstern have been defended as descriptive or empirical generalizations and as normative principles. It is argued that the postulates are inaccurate empirical generalizations and unacceptable normative principles.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations