Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Personality and Philosophical Bias.Adam Feltz & Edward T. Cokely - 2016 - In Justin Sytsma & Wesley Buckwalter (eds.), A Companion to Experimental Philosophy. Malden, MA: Wiley. pp. 578–589.
    Heritable personality traits often predict fundamental philosophical disagreement. This conclusion is based on studies of more than 15,000 people sampled from diverse cultures and educational backgrounds, including verifiable experts. In this chapter, we review some of this research showing links between personality and philosophical bias in free will, intentional action, and ethics. Our discussion focuses on serious challenges that these philosophical biases pose (e.g., limits on the use of philosophical intuitions as evidence). We close with discussion of the Philosophical Personality (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • In the patient’s best interest: appraising social network site information for surrogate decision making.Shahla Siddiqui & Voo Teck Chuan - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (12):851-856.
    This paper will discuss why and how social network sites ought to be used in surrogate decision making (SDM), with focus on a context like Singapore in which substituted judgment is incorporated as part of best interest assessment for SDM, as guided by the Code of Practice for making decisions for those lacking mental capacity under the Mental Capacity Act (2008). Specifically, the paper will argue that the Code of Practice already supports an ethical obligation, as part of a patient-centred (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Surrogate Decision Making in the Internet Age”.Jessica Berg - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (10):W1-W2.
    The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 12, Issue 10, Page W1-W2, October 2012.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation