Switch to: References

Citations of:

Democracy, citizenship and the bits in between

In Richard Bellamy (ed.), Citizenship. New York: pp. 623-640 (2011)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Ethics of Immigration: Self‐Determination and the Right to Exclude.Sarah Fine - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (3):254-268.
    Many of us take it for granted that states have a right to control the entry and settlement of non‐citizens in their territories, and hardly pause to consider or evaluate the moral justifications for immigration controls. For a long time, very few political philosophers showed a great deal of interest in the subject. However, it is now attracting much more attention in the discipline. This article aims to show that we most certainly should not take it for granted that states (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  • (1 other version)Non-domination and the ethics of migration.Sarah Fine - 2014 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 17 (1):10-30.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • (1 other version)Non-domination and the ethics of migration.Sarah Fine - 2014 - In Iseult Honohan & Marit Hovdal-Moan (eds.), Domination, Migration and Non-Citizens. Routledge. pp. 10-30.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • Vulnerable minorities and democratic legitimacy in refugee admission.Zsolt Kapelner - 2020 - Ethics and Global Politics 13 (1):50-63.
    In this paper I examine the question of what duties the principles of democratic legitimacy prescribe for receiving states towards asylum seekers in general, and towards those who belong to vulnera...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Democratic Enfranchisement Beyond Citizenship: The All-Affected Principle in Theory and Practice.Annette Zimmermann - 2018 - Dissertation, Oxford University
    This is a collection of four papers about the All-Affected Principle (AAP): the view that every person whose morally weighty interests are affected by a democratic decision has the right to participate in that decision. -/- The first paper (“Narrow Possibilism about Democratic Enfranchisement”) examines how we should distribute democratic participation rights: a plausible version of AAP must avoid treating unlike cases alike, which would be procedurally unfair. The solution is to distribute participation rights proportionately to the risk that a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark