Switch to: References

Citations of:

Neuroethics and the lure of technology

In Judy Illes & Barbara J. Sahakian (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Neuroethics. Oxford University Press. pp. 895--907 (2011)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Subject and Family Perspectives from the Central Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation Trial for Traumatic Brain Injury: Part II.Joseph J. Fins, Megan S. Wright, Kaiulani S. Shulman, Jaimie M. Henderson & Nicholas D. Schiff - forthcoming - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics:1-24.
    This is the second paper in a two-part series describing subject and family perspectives from the CENTURY-S (CENtral Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for the Treatment of Traumatic Brain InjURY-Safety) first-in-human invasive neurological device trial to achieve cognitive restoration in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (msTBI). To participate, subjects were independently assessed to formally establish decision-making capacity to provide voluntary informed consent. Here, we report on post-operative interviews conducted after a successful trial of thalamic stimulation. All five msTBI subjects met (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • (1 other version)Neuroética aplicada: las consecuencias prácticas del neuropositivismo.Domingo García-Marzá - 2016 - Pensamiento 72 (273):881-900.
    El objetivo de este trabajo es mostrar las consecuencias prácticas de una autocomprensión positivista de la neuroética aplicada. Esta ética se ocupa de los impactos éticos y sociales derivados de la utilización de los hallazgos neurocientificos, en especial de las neurotecnologías. La intención es mostrar que para realizar esta tarea la neuroética debe superar el paradigma neuropositivista dominante que solo le conduce a la disolución del ámbito moral y, en el terreno práctico, al silencio cómplice ante los problemas surgidos en (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • What makes neuroethics possible?Fernando Vidal - 2019 - History of the Human Sciences 32 (2):32-58.
    Since its emergence in the early 2000s, neuroethics has become a recognized, institutionalized and professionalized field. A central strategy for its successful development has been the claim that it must be an autonomous discipline, distinct in particular from bioethics. Such claim has been justified by the conviction, sustained since the 1990s by the capabilities attributed to neuroimaging technologies, that somehow ‘the mind is the brain’, that the brain sciences can illuminate the full range of human experience and behavior, and that (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Deep Brain Stimulation: Paradoxes and a Plea.Judy Illes - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 3 (1):65-70.
    Deep brain stimulation (DBS) represents a promising new frontier in medicine and neuroscience for managing disorders of mental health that represent an enormous burden of disease on our societies. The caution and significant restraint of leaders in the evolution of DBS today stand in sharp and refreshing contrast to previous episodes in history. In embracing the anticipatory and pragmatic problem-solving approach of neuroethics to clinical neuroscience, four significant paradoxes for DBS today come to the fore: caution and innovation, capacity and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark