Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Discrepancies in the outcomes resulting from different voting schemes.Hannu Nurmi - 1988 - Theory and Decision 25 (2):193-208.
    It is well-known that different social choice procedures often result in different choice sets. The article focuses on how often this is likely to happen in impartial cultures. The focus is on Borda count, plurality method, max-min method and Copeland's procedure. The probabilities of Condorcet violations of the Borda count and plurality method are also reported. Although blatantly false as a descriptive hypothesis, the impartial culture assumption can be given an interpretation which makes the results obtained in impartial cultures particularly (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Dimensions of election procedures: Analyses and comparisons.Peter C. Fishburn - 1983 - Theory and Decision 15 (4):371-397.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Microcosms and macrocosms: Seat allocation in proportional representation systems.Amnon Rapoport, Dan S. Felsenthal & Zeev Maoz - 1988 - Theory and Decision 24 (1):11-33.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Sophisticated voting under the plurality procedure: A test of a new definition. [REVIEW]Richard G. Niemi & Arthur Q. Frank - 1985 - Theory and Decision 19 (2):151-162.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Review of paradoxes afflicting various voting procedures where one out of m candidates (m ≥ 2) must be elected. [REVIEW]Dan S. Felsenthal - unknown
    The paper surveys 17 deterministic electoral procedures for selecting one out of two or more candidates, as well as the susceptibility of each of these procedures to various paradoxes. A detailed appendix exemplifies the paradoxes to which each electoral procedure is susceptible. It is concluded that from the perspective of vulnerability to serious paradoxes, as well as in light of additional technical criteria, Copeland’s or Kemeny’s proposed procedures are the most desirable.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Peter C. Fishburn.Fred S. Roberts, William V. Gehrlein & Steven J. Brams - 2021 - Theory and Decision 93 (1):1-6.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The expected likelihood of transitivity: A survey.William V. Gehrlein - 1994 - Theory and Decision 37 (2):175-209.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation