Switch to: References

Citations of:

Discourse on Civility and Barbarity

New York: Oxford University Press USA (2007)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Habermas, same-sex marriage and the problem of religion in public life.Darren R. Walhof - 2013 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 39 (3):225-242.
    This article addresses the debate over religion in the public sphere by analysing the conception of ‘religion’ in the recent work of Habermas, who claims to mediate the divide between those who defend public appeals to religion without restriction and those who place limits on such appeals. I argue that Habermas’ translation requirement and his restriction on religious reasons in the institutional public sphere rest on a conception of religion as essentially apolitical in its origin. This conception, I argue, remains (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Historicizing the category of “religion” in sociological theories: Max Weber and Emile Durkheim.Mitsutoshi Horii - 2019 - Critical Research on Religion 7 (1):24-37.
    The generic notion of “religion” and its conceptual demarcation from “the secular” have been critically examined by a number of scholars from the “critical religion” perspective. The interrogation of the term “religion,” and other related terms, questions modern formations of knowledge and power in general. This paper constitutes part of the project which examines norms and imperatives which govern sociological discourse on religion. Max Weber and Emile Durkheim are particularly significant figures in sociology of religion. The aim of this paper (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Theses on the critique of “religion”.Craig Martin - 2015 - Critical Research on Religion 3 (3):297-302.
    Those of us who study the history and politics of the concept of religion and its related terms often find that our peers in adjacent disciplines or subdisciplines do not take into account our findings and continue to use the terms naively and unreflexively. Perhaps this is because they are unaware of the problematic norms knotted into the history of the concept or the contested political stakes involved in its use. Or, perhaps they are engaged in just the very sort (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The a Priori Critique of the Possibility of a Phenomenology of Religion: A Response to the Special Issue on “Schutz and Religion”.Jonathan Tuckett - 2019 - Human Studies 42 (4):647-672.
    This paper offers a critique of the special issue of Human Studies on “Alfred Schutz and Religion”. Following a line similar to that of Dominique Janicaud I call into question the very phenomenological status of the “phenomenology of religion” developed across the various contributions. Appealing to the Husserlian principle of freedom from presuppositions my critique focuses on the way these phenomenologies of religion talk about “religion”. At their core, the failure contained within these contributions is the failure to properly consider (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations