Switch to: References

Citations of:

Sparse coding in the primate cortex

In Michael A. Arbib (ed.), Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks. MIT Press. pp. 1--1064 (1995)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Gestalt Models for Data Decomposition and Functional Architecture in Visual Neuroscience.Carmelo Calì - 2013 - Gestalt Theory 35 (3).
    Attempts to introduce Gestalt theory into the realm of visual neuroscience are discussed on both theoretical and experimental grounds. To define the framework in which these proposals can be defended, this paper outlines the characteristics of a standard model, which qualifies as a received view in the visual neurosciences, and of the research into natural images statistics. The objections to the standard model and the main questions of the natural images research are presented. On these grounds, this paper defends the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Ockham's razor at work: Modeling of the ``homunculus''. [REVIEW]András Lörincz, Barnabás Póczos, Gábor Szirtes & Bálint Takács - 2002 - Brain and Mind 3 (2):187-220.
    There is a broad consensus about the fundamental role of thehippocampal system (hippocampus and its adjacent areas) in theencoding and retrieval of episodic memories. This paper presents afunctional model of this system. Although memory is not asingle-unit cognitive function, we took the view that the wholesystem of the smooth, interrelated memory processes may have acommon basis. That is why we follow the Ockham's razor principleand minimize the size or complexity of our model assumption set.The fundamental assumption is the requirement of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • An efficient coding approach to the debate on grounded cognition.Abel Wajnerman Paz - 2018 - Synthese 195 (12):5245-5269.
    The debate between the amodal and the grounded views of cognition seems to be stuck. Their only substantial disagreement is about the vehicle or format of concepts. Amodal theorists reject the grounded claim that concepts are couched in the same modality-specific format as representations in sensory systems. The problem is that there is no clear characterization of format or its neural correlate. In order to make the disagreement empirically meaningful and move forward in the discussion we need a neurocognitive criterion (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations