Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Explicit nomenclature and classification in Pliny’s Natural History XXXII.Andrea Guasparri - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (3):347-353.
    Pliny’s Natural History has been traditionally considered as the unoriginal work of an uncritical compiler. This has also been held to be true of the “biological” books, especially when one compares them with the works of Aristotle, one of Pliny’s main authorities in this domain. Aristotle’s achievements would be remarkable, especially in the field of classification, of which the philosopher is traditionally celebrated as the scientific father. However, by carefully reading HN XXXII it is possible to find a certain “taxonomic” (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Frequency and Content of the Last Fifty Years of Papers on Aristotle’s Writings on Biological Phenomena.Christopher F. Sharpley & Clemens Koehn - 2022 - Journal of the History of Biology 55 (3):585-607.
    Aristotle is often named as the first zoologist or biologist because of his writings on animals. Although Aristotle’s major intention in these books was to illustrate his ideas of how knowledge and understanding might advance, at least one modern biologist (C. Darwin) has recognized Aristotle's depth and breadth as being of surviving merit. Of greater surprise is the ongoing attention that his works continue to receive, including publications in contemporary scientific journals. This review identifies 38 peer-reviewed papers on various topics (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark