Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Government regulation or industry self-regulation of AI? Investigating the relationships between uncertainty avoidance, people’s AI risk perceptions, and their regulatory preferences in Europe.Bartosz Wilczek, Sina Thäsler-Kordonouri & Maximilian Eder - forthcoming - AI and Society:1-15.
    Artificial Intelligence (AI) has the potential to influence people’s lives in various ways as it is increasingly integrated into important decision-making processes in key areas of society. While AI offers opportunities, it is also associated with risks. These risks have sparked debates about how AI should be regulated, whether through government regulation or industry self-regulation. AI-related risk perceptions can be shaped by national cultures, especially the cultural dimension of uncertainty avoidance. This raises the question of whether people in countries with (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Trustworthy AI: AI made in Germany and Europe?Hartmut Hirsch-Kreinsen & Thorben Krokowski - 2024 - AI and Society 39 (6):2921-2931.
    As the capabilities of artificial intelligence (AI) continue to expand, concerns are also growing about the ethical and social consequences of unregulated development and, above all, use of AI systems in a wide range of social areas. It is therefore indisputable that the application of AI requires social standardization and regulation. For years, innovation policy measures and the most diverse activities of European and German institutions have been directed toward this goal. Under the label “Trustworthy AI” (TAI), a promise is (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Determinants of digital well-being.Lewend Mayiwar, Erkin Asutay, Gustav Tinghög, Daniel Västfjäll & Kinga Barrafrem - forthcoming - AI and Society:1-11.
    How can people lead fulfilling lives both thanks to and despite the constant use of digital media and artificial intelligence? While the prevailing narrative often portrays these technologies as generally harmful to well-being, the reality is of course more nuanced—some individuals benefit, while others do not. Existing research has predominantly focused on the general consequences of digital media on well-being, with less attention given to the individual-level antecedents of digital well-being. In the present study, we aimed to identify the traits (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Imagining and governing artificial intelligence: the ordoliberal way—an analysis of the national strategy ‘AI made in Germany’.Jens Hälterlein - forthcoming - AI and Society:1-12.
    National Artificial Intelligence (AI) strategies articulate imaginaries of the integration of AI into society and envision the governing of AI research, development and applications accordingly. To integrate these central aspects of national AI strategies under one coherent perspective, this paper presented an analysis of Germany’s strategy ‘AI made in Germany’ through the conceptual lens of ordoliberal political rationality. The first part of the paper analyses how the guiding vision of a human-centric AI not only adheres to ethical and legal principles (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation