Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Astell and Masham on Epistemic Authority and Women's Individual Judgment in Religion.Kenneth L. Pearce - 2022 - Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 9:197–226.
    In 1705, Mary Astell and Damaris Masham both published works advocating for women's use of individual judgment in matters of religion. Although both philosophers advocate for women's education and intellectual autonomy, and both are adherents of the Church of England, they differ dramatically in their attitudes to religious authority. These differences are rooted in a deeper disagreement about the nature of epistemic authority in general. Astell defends an interpersonal model of epistemic authority on which we properly trust testimony when the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Lady Damaris Masham.Sarah Hutton - 2020 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Elizabeth Tollet: A New Newtonian Woman.Patricia Fara - 2002 - History of Science 40 (2):169-187.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • La dimensión crítica de la moral: la correspondencia Masham-Leibniz.Viridiana Platas - forthcoming - Filosofia Unisinos:1-9.
    Este ensayo propone analizar la correspondencia entre Damaris Masham y G. W. Leibniz a través de tres dimensiones de discusión: ontológica, epistemológica y crítica. Dicho análisis puede ser útil para entender los fundamentos epistemológicos del racionalismo moral y pedagógico de la filósofa inglesa. En ese sentido, se ofrece una integración de elementos que permiten entender no sólo la coincidencia de tradiciones tan aparentemente antitéticas como el platonismo y el empirismo en la filosofía de Masham, también permiten apreciar su independencia intelectual. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark