Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Algorithmic Transparency and Manipulation.Michael Klenk - 2023 - Philosophy and Technology 36 (4):1-20.
    A series of recent papers raises worries about the manipulative potential of algorithmic transparency (to wit, making visible the factors that influence an algorithm’s output). But while the concern is apt and relevant, it is based on a fraught understanding of manipulation. Therefore, this paper draws attention to the ‘indifference view’ of manipulation, which explains better than the ‘vulnerability view’ why algorithmic transparency has manipulative potential. The paper also raises pertinent research questions for future studies of manipulation in the context (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Liberty, Manipulation, and Algorithmic Transparency: Reply to Franke.Michael Klenk - 2024 - Philosophy and Technology 37 (2):1-8.
    Franke, in Philosophy & Technology, 37(1), 1–6, (2024), connects the recent debate about manipulative algorithmic transparency with the concerns about problematic pursuits of positive liberty. I argue that the indifference view of manipulative transparency is not aligned with positive liberty, contrary to Franke’s claim, and even if it is, it is not aligned with the risk that many have attributed to pursuits of positive liberty. Moreover, I suggest that Franke’s worry may generalise beyond the manipulative transparency debate to AI ethics (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Why Should We Care About the Manipulative Power of Algorithmic Transparency?Hao Wang - 2023 - Philosophy and Technology 36 (1):1-6.
    Franke Philosophy & Technology, 35(4), 1-7, (2022) offers an interesting claim that algorithmic transparency as manipulation does not necessarily follow that it is good or bad. Different people can have good reasons to adopt different evaluative attitudes towards this manipulation. Despite agreeing with some of his observations, this short reply will examine three crucial misconceptions in his arguments. In doing so, it defends why we are morally obliged to care about the manipulative potential of algorithmic transparency. It suggests that we (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Algorithmic Transparency, Manipulation, and Two Concepts of Liberty.Ulrik Franke - 2024 - Philosophy and Technology 37 (1):1-6.
    As more decisions are made by automated algorithmic systems, the transparency of these systems has come under scrutiny. While such transparency is typically seen as beneficial, there is a also a critical, Foucauldian account of it. From this perspective, worries have recently been articulated that algorithmic transparency can be used for manipulation, as part of a disciplinary power structure. Klenk (Philosophy & Technology 36, 79, 2023) recently argued that such manipulation should not be understood as exploitation of vulnerable victims, but (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation