Switch to: References

Citations of:

Harre on causation

Philosophy of Science 43 (4):560-569 (1976)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Powers, causation, and modality.Robert K. Shope - 1988 - Erkenntnis 28 (3):321 - 362.
    A complex theory concerning powers, natures, and causal necessity has emerged from the writings of P. H. Hare, E. H. Madden, and R. Harré. In the course of rebutting objections that other critics have raised to the power account of causation, I correct three of its genuine difficulties: its attempt to analyze power attributions in terms of conditional statements; its characterization of the relation between something's powers and its nature; and its doctrines concerning conceptual necessity. The resulting interpretation of causal (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Harre and Madden's multifarious account of natural necessity.Raymond Woller - 1982 - Philosophy of Science 49 (4):616-632.
    In this paper, I critically examine Harre and Madden's attempt, largely as it occurs in their Causal Powers, to secure for causes and laws of nature a kind of necessity which although consistent with commonsensical empiricism and anti-idealistic philosophy of science nevertheless runs counter to the humean-positivistic tradition, which denies the existence of any distinctively "natural" or causal necessity. In the course of the paper, I reveal the multifarious nature of their account and show that each part of that account, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Dispositions defined: Harré and Madden on analyzing disposition concepts.Fred Wilson - 1985 - Philosophy of Science 52 (4):591-607.
    If one proposes to analyze dispositions by means of statements involving only the 'if-then' of material implication--that is, for example, to define 'x is soluble' by means of 'x is in water ⊃ x dissolves'--then one faces the problem first raised by Carnap, the match which is never put in water and which therefore turns out to be not only soluble but also both soluble and insoluble. I have elsewhere argued that if one refers to appropriate laws, then one can (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • A reply to Frankel's criticism of Harre's theory of causality.Joseph Wayne Smith - 1982 - Philosophy of Science 49 (2):282-289.
    Frankel has argued that the theory of causality developed by Rom Harré and his colleague Edward Madden is incoherent, since the proposal that causal claims are naturally necessary leads to a vicious infinite regression“which ends by requiring that for any causal claim to be accorded the status of natural necessity an infinite number of causal claims must be accorded the status of natural necessities.”.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations