Citations of:
The Non-Reductionist's Troubles with Supervenience
Philosophical Studies 89 (1):105-124 (1998)
Add citations
You must login to add citations.
|
|
|
In a recent critique of the doctrine of emergentism championed by its classic advocates up to C. D. Broad, Jaegwon Kim (Philosophical Studies 63:31–47, 1999) challenges their view about its applicability to the sciences and proposes a new account of how the opposing notion of reduction should be understood. Kim is critical of the classic conception advanced by Nagel and uses his new account in his criticism of emergentism. I question his claims about the successful reduction achieved in the sciences (...) |
