Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Human–Computer Interaction Research Needs a Theory of Social Structure: The Dark Side of Digital Technology Systems Hidden in User Experience.Ryan Gunderson - 2022 - Human Studies 45 (3):529-550.
    A sociological revision of Aron Gurwitsch provides a helpful layered theory of conscious experience as a four-domain structure: _the theme_, _the thematic field_, _the halo_, and _the social horizon_. The social horizon—the totality of the social world that is unknown, vaguely known, taken for granted, or ignored by the subject despite objectively influencing the thoughts and actions of the subject—, helps conceptualize how everyday human–computer interaction (HCI) can obscure social structures. Two examples illustrate the usefulness of this framework: (1) illuminating (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Getting of Sexuality: Foucault, Garfinkel and the Analysis of Sexual Discourse.Alec McHoul - 1986 - Theory, Culture and Society 3 (2):65-79.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Ethnomethodology and the position of relativist discourse.A. W. Mchoul - 1981 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 11 (2):107–124.
    The paper works through the topic of ‘theorising’ as it has been treated in ethnomethodology. It is concerned to show that the topic has a somewhat equivocal status within that discourse; that some recent self-critical moves in ethnomethodology which have been touched off by considering these problems constitute no more than further uncritical repetitions of that discourse; that ethnomethodology's critics have been concentrating unnecessarily upon its supposed ‘idealism’ and have missed a central trouble: that ethnomethodology is an overly realist form (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Doing focus group research: Studying rational ordering in focus group interaction.Laura Bang Lindegaard - 2014 - Discourse Studies 16 (5):629-644.
    Scholars of ethnomethodologically informed discourse studies are often sceptical of the use of interview data such as focus group data. Some scholars quite simply reject interview data with reference to a general preference for so-called naturally occurring data. Other scholars acknowledge that interview data can be of some use if the distinction between natural and contrived data is given up and replaced with a distinction between interview data as topic or as resource. In greater detail, such scholars argue that interview (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark