Switch to: References

Citations of:

Georg Simmel

Kant Studien 24 (1):1 (1920)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Georg Simmel and Pragmatism.Martin Kusch - 2019 - European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 11 (1).
    This paper offers some brief reflections on pragmatist themes in Georg Simmel’s philosophy. §1 presents a number of assessments – by Simmel’s contemporaries, by later interpreters, and by Simmel himself – concerning his proximity to pragmatism. §2 offers a reconstruction of Simmel’s 1885-paper “The Relationship between the Theory of Selection and Epistemology,” focusing in particular on what the argument owed to von Helmholtz. It was this paper first and foremost that suggested to many that Simmel was close to pragmatism. §§3-5 (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Causality or Interaction? Simmel, Weber and Interpretive Sociology.Klaus Lichtblau - 1991 - Theory, Culture and Society 8 (3):33-62.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Soziologie and Lebensanschauung: Two Approaches to Synthesizing ‘Kant’ and ‘Goethe’ in Simmel’s Work.Donald N. Levine - 2012 - Theory, Culture and Society 29 (7-8):26-52.
    Contrary to common perceptions of Simmel’s work as dividing into three stages of Darwinism, Kantianism, and Goethean/Bergsonian Life-Philosophy, consideration of the full scope of the Georg Simmel Gesamtausgabe demonstrates Simmel’s concern with both Kant and Goethe as life-long, just as was his engagement with core principles respectively associated with them: Form and Life. What changed in his mind over time was how those two principles were construed and related. In this view, Simmel’s Soziologie can be read as a treatise on (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • On the Critique of `Utilitarian' Theories of Action.Donald N. Levine - 2000 - Theory, Culture and Society 17 (1):63-78.
    Although Parsons encountered the works of both Simmel and Weber during his stay at Heidelberg in the late 1920s, his appropriation of the two became increasingly asymmetrical, issuing in a lifelong devotion to Weber and a pronounced disavowal of Simmel around the time Parsons published The Structure of Social Action. This reaction deprived Parsons of the substantial support he could have found in Simmel's work for his effort to counteract `utilitarian' theories of action. Simmel not only went beyond Parsons in (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations