Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Putting the Asymmetry Debate in Its Place.Abram L. Brummett - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (8):68-69.
    The target article by Kyle Fritz draws attention to the asymmetry debate, an under-analyzed issue within the broader debate over the proper role of physician conscience in healthcare. The as...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • What Makes Conscientious Refusals Concerning Abortion Different.Jason T. Eberl - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (8):62-64.
    Fritz argues that there is an “unjustified asymmetry” in legislation that allows physicians and health care institutions to refuse to provide elective abortions and other morally contested l...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Does Medicine Need to Accommodate Positive Conscientious Objections to Morally Self-Correct?Kyle Ferguson & Eric J. Kim - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (8):74-76.
    The controversy around the accommodation of conscientious objections in medicine persists, especially for such contentious services as abortions. COs are typically considered in their negativ...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Medical Disobedience and the Conscientious Provision of Prohibited Care.Dov Fox - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (8):72-74.
    Should doctors ever be allowed to offer care that their state or employer forbids? What if their deeply held personal values or beliefs demand they treat patients in need? We’re used to hearing abo...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The Wrong Argument for a Bad Law.Eric Mathison - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (8):77-79.
    Kyle Fritz argues for the following conditional statement: if healthcare providers should be allowed to conscientiously object to providing abortions in jurisdictions where abortions...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Justifying Positive Appeals to Conscience: The Debate We Can’T Avoid.Daniel J. Miller - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (8):79-81.
    Protecting claims of conscience can function to fairly balance burdens among relevant parties without first having to resolve an underlying and intractable moral disagreement. Recently, a number of theorists have argued that the relevant criteria for protecting negative appeals to conscience in health care can (suitably modified) be equally well-satisfied in cases of positive appeals. I argue that, when it comes to certain practices, the justification of positive appeals to conscience does in fact depend upon contested claims in the debate (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Conscience Claims and Cost: Tribunals and the Asymmetry Debate.Lisa Campo-Engelstein & David Michael Vaughan - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (8):70-72.
    We appreciate Fritz’s thoughtful analysis of the asymmetry between legal protections for negative and positive conscience claims and are particularly interested in further exploring the conc...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Justified Asymmetries: Positive and Negative Claims to Conscience in Reproductive Health Care.Carolyn McLeod - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (8):60-62.
    A peer commentary on an AJOB article by Kyle Fritz called "Unjustified Asymmetry: Positive Claims of Conscience and Heartbeat Bills.".
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Conscience Clauses and Ideological Bias.Mark Wicclair - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (8):65-67.
    Conscience clauses typically protect health care providers who cannot in good conscience provide a legal, professionally accepted, and clinically appropriate medical service (negative appeals to co...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark