Switch to: References

Citations of:

Psychoanalysis and Zen Buddhism

Boston: Unwin Paperbacks (1960)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. “Just a Swinging Door” – Examining the Egocentric Misconception of Meditation.Antti Wiljami Saari & Jani Pulkki - 2012 - Paideusis: Journal of the Canadian Philosophy of Education Society 20 (2):15-24.
    Various kinds of contemplative practices have been a part of the western philosophical tradition since the Age of Antiquity. Today, however, philosophy as a way of life has ceased to be an integral part of academic practice. The capability to gain knowledge or understanding is believed to come out of pure intellectual endeavor, without exercising the mind and body holistically. This has created a blind spot for philosophy, where no profound pedagogical and moral transformation of subjectivity can be articulated. Furthermore, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Illustrations of Peak Experiences during Optimal Performance in World-class Performers: Integrating Eastern and Western Insights.Harald S. Harung - 2012 - Journal of Human Values 18 (1):33-52.
    Management and performance are interdisciplinary, spanning diverse fields such as business, industry, government, sports, arts, health and education. In four studies, world-class performers in a variety of fields, for example, management, sports and classical music, have been found to display higher mind–brain development than matched average-performing control groups, including more frequent peak experiences. In this article, we will use a selection of clearly articulated peak experiences reported by these world-class performers to illustrate the subjective or inner nature of optimal performance. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Mysticism of Chan/Zen Enlightenment: A Rational Understanding through Practices.Ming Dong Gu & Jianping Guo - 2017 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 16 (2):235-251.
    There exists a widely accepted opinion in Chan/Zen 禪 studies that Chan enlightenment is a mysterium ineffabile, impenetrable by human intellect. Reviewing the debate between Hu Shi 胡適 and D. T. Suzuki over Chan enlightenment and accounts of testimony by Chan masters and practitioners in history, this essay argues that Chan enlightenment can be understood rationally and intellectually. By analyzing the time-honored Chan practices that have led to enlightenment, it seeks to understand the mystery as an extraordinary mental condition in (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation