Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Questionable benefits and unavoidable personal beliefs: defending conscientious objection for abortion.Bruce Philip Blackshaw & Daniel Rodger - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 3 (46):178-182.
    Conscientious objection in healthcare has come under heavy criticism on two grounds recently, particularly regarding abortion provision. First, critics claim conscientious objection involves a refusal to provide a legal and beneficial procedure requested by a patient, denying them access to healthcare. Second, they argue the exercise of conscientious objection is based on unverifiable personal beliefs. These characteristics, it is claimed, disqualify conscientious objection in healthcare. Here, we defend conscientious objection in the context of abortion provision. We show that abortion has (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • What does it mean for a clinical AI to be just: conflicts between local fairness and being fit-for-purpose?Michal Pruski - forthcoming - Journal of Medical Ethics.
    There have been repeated calls to ensure that clinical artificial intelligence (AI) is not discriminatory, that is, it provides its intended benefit to all members of society irrespective of the status of any protected characteristics of individuals in whose healthcare the AI might participate. There have also been repeated calls to ensure that any clinical AI is tailored to the local population in which it is being used to ensure that it is fit-for-purpose. Yet, there might be a clash between (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Nazis, Teleology, and the Freedom of Conscience: In Response to Gamble and Pruski’s ‘Medical Acts and Conscientious Objection: What Can a Physician be Compelled to Do?’.Marcus Wischik - 2019 - The New Bioethics 25 (4):359-373.
    Medical practitioners of all specialisms are identified by their professional titles. Their function is determined by their regulators, and subject to voluntary employment contracts....
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Understanding Conscientious Objection and the Acceptability of its Practice in Primary Care.Anne Williams - 2022 - The New Bioethics 29 (2):156-180.
    Ethically challenging or controversial medical procedures have prompted increasing requests for the exercise of conscientious objection, and caused concerns about how and when it should be practised. This paper clarifies definitions, especially with regard to discrimination, and explores the restrictions, duties, and practical limitations, in order to suggest criteria for its practice. It also argues that a conscientious refusal to treat, where there is therapeutic doubt, is a valid form of conscientious objection. An email survey sent to General Practitioners (GPs), (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Conflicts, Conscientious Objection and Compromise.Trevor Stammers - 2021 - The New Bioethics 27 (1):1-2.
    Bioethics is not a field for the faint-hearted. Life and death decisions are both at stake and everything in between. Increasingly, before-life decisions are being taken as well and this issue comm...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Quotas: Enabling Conscientious Objection to Coexist with Abortion Access.Daniel Rodger & Bruce P. Blackshaw - 2020 - Health Care Analysis 29 (2):154-169.
    The debate regarding the role of conscientious objection in healthcare has been protracted, with increasing demands for curbs on conscientious objection. There is a growing body of evidence that indicates that in some cases, high rates of conscientious objection can affect access to legal medical services such as abortion—a major concern of critics of conscientious objection. Moreover, few solutions have been put forward that aim to satisfy both this concern and that of defenders of conscientious objection—being expected to participate in (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The right to choose to abort an abortion: should pro-choice advocates support abortion pill reversal?Michal Pruski, Dominic Whitehouse & Steven Bow - 2022 - The New Bioethics 28 (3):252-267.
    Abortion pill reversal treatment aims to halt an initiated medical abortion, wherein a pregnant woman takes progesterone after having taken the first of the two consecutive abortion pills, ty...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Reply to: Beyond Money: Conscientious Objection in Medicine as a Conflict of Interests.Michal Pruski - 2021 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 18 (1):177-180.
    Giubilini and Savulescu in their recent Journal of Bioethical Inquiry symposium article presented an account of conscientious objection that argues for its recognition as a non-financial conflict of interest. In this short commentary, I highlight some problems with their account. First, I discuss their solicitor analogy. Second, I discuss some problems surrounding their objectivity claim about standards of medical care. Next, I discuss some issues arising from consistently applying their approach. Finally, I highlight that conscientious objection should be viewed not (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Conscientious objection and systemic injustice.Michal Pruski - 2020 - Clinical Ethics (3):147775092090345.
    This paper follows on from a brief debate about the role of conscientious objection in healthcare, where the issue arose as to whether conscientious objection is (or can) be a tool of resistance against systemic injustice. The paper contributes to this debate by highlighting that some authors generally opposed to conscientious objection in healthcare have shown some support to this idea. Perhaps if there is one area in which all can agree, it is that in healthcare conscientious objection should be (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • AI-Enhanced Healthcare: Not a new Paradigm for Informed Consent.M. Pruski - forthcoming - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry:1-15.
    With the increasing prevalence of artificial intelligence (AI) and other digital technologies in healthcare, the ethical debate surrounding their adoption is becoming more prominent. Here I consider the issue of gaining informed patient consent to AI-enhanced care from the vantage point of the United Kingdom’s National Health Service setting. I build my discussion around two claims from the World Health Organization: that healthcare services should not be denied to individuals who refuse AI-enhanced care and that there is no precedence to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Acts and distance—a commentary on Brummett's ‘when conscientious objection runs amok’.Michal Pruski - 2022 - Clinical Ethics 17 (2):211-216.
    In his ‘When conscientious objection runs amok: A physician refusing human immunodeficiency virus preventative to a bisexual patient’, Brummett has argued that Catholic physicians should not be able to raise conscientious objections to HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis for bisexual patients, as this constitutes discrimination. Brummett argues that such a conscientious objection represents an instance of conscience creep, which he argues is undesirable. Here I re-analyse the case presented by Brummett using a teleological framework and making reference to Catholic teaching on cooperation (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The rule of right vs might: a reply to Wischik's ‘Nazis, teleology, and the freedom of conscience'.Nathan K. Gamble & Michal Pruski - 2021 - The New Bioethics 27 (1):81-95.
    Wischik presents an extensive reply to our paper on conscientious objection, which explores the implications of distinguishing ‘medical acts’ from ‘socioclinical acts’. He provides an extensive leg...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • ‘Swear by Thy Gracious Self’: North American Medical Oath-Taking in 2014/2015.Nathan Gamble, Benjamin Holler & Stephen Murata - 2022 - The New Bioethics 29 (2):121-138.
    Over the past century, six studies – the most recent data from 2000 – and one review have comprehensively examined the content of medical oaths and oath-taking practices, all focusing on North Amer...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A taxonomy of conscientious objection in healthcare.Nathan Gamble & Toni Saad - 2022 - Clinical Ethics 17 (1):63-70.
    Conscientious Objection has become a highly contested topic in the bioethics literature and public policy. However, when CO is discussed, it is almost universally referred to as a single entity. Reality reveals a more nuanced picture. Healthcare professionals may object to a given action on numerous grounds. They may oppose an action because of its ends, its means, or because of factors that lay outside of both ends and means. Our paper develops a taxonomy of CO, which makes it possible (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation