Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Sleigh's Leibniz and Arnauld.J. J. Macintosh - 1994 - Dialogue 33 (3):473-.
    R. C. Sleigh's Leibniz and Arnauld: A Commentary on Their Correspondence is a very good book: it is detailed, clearly written, well argued and attentive to the historical background. The more I read it, the more I enjoyed it and the more I learned. Not only does it offer a wide variety of interesting points for the reader to agree and disagree with, it has, also, the virtue of pretty well forcing the reader to think about the issues involved and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A Constructivist Account of Sartre's Theory of Biography.Mano Daniel & Richard Holmes - 1998 - Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 29 (2):174-188.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Senses of the Sublime: Possibilities for a Non-Ocular Sublime in Kant's Critique of Judgment.C. E. Emmer - 2001 - In Volker Gerhardt, Rolf-Peter Horstmann & Ralph Schumacher (eds.), Kant Und Die Berliner Aufklärung: Akten des IX Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. New York: Walter de Gruyter. pp. 512-519.
    It might at first seem that the senses (the five traditionally recognized conduits of outer sense) would have very little to contribute to an investigation of Kant's aesthetics. Is not Kant's aesthetic theory based on a relation of the higher cognitive faculties? Much however can be revealed by asking to what degree sight is essential to aesthetic judgment (of beauty and the sublime) as Kant describes it in the 'Critique of Judgment.' Here the sublime receives particular attention.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation