Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Does Consumer Engagement in Health Technology Assessment Enhance or Undermine Equity?Narcyz Ghinea, Wendy Lipworth & Ian Kerridge - 2020 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 17 (1):87-94.
    Consumer engagement in decisions about the funding of medicines is often framed as a good in and of itself and as an activity that should be universally encouraged. A common justification for calls for consumer engagement is that it enhances equity. In this paper we systematically critique this assumption. We show that consumer engagement may undermine equity as well as enhance it and show that a simple relationship cannot be assumed but must be justified and demonstrated. In concluding, we present (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • A 450 Year Old Turkish Poem, Art as a Qualitative Investigation Tool, Buddhist Deathways, Karma and Eudaimonia in Death and Organ Donation: The Wonders of Truly Diverse Bioethical Inquiry!Michael A. Ashby - 2017 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14 (3):315-318.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Pharmacological and ethical comparisons of lung cancer medicine accessibility in Australia and New Zealand.Elizabeth Fenton & John Ashton - forthcoming - Journal of Medical Ethics.
    Gaps in funded cancer medicines between New Zealand and Australia can have significant implications for patients and their families. Pharmac, the New Zealand pharmaceutical funding agency, has been criticised for not funding enough cancer medicines, and a 2022 review identified ethical concerns about its utilitarian focus on efficiency. However, as the costs of new cancer medicines rise along with public and political pressure to fund them, questions about value for money remain critical for health systems worldwide. In this paper, we (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark