Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. (1 other version)Models Clarified: Responding to Langdon Gilkey.William H. Klink David E. Klemm - 2003 - Zygon 38 (3):535-541.
    We respond to concerns raised by Langdon Gilkey. The discussion addresses the nature of theological thinking today, the question of truth within the situation of pluralism, the identity and difference between theological models and scientific models, and the proposed methods for testing theological models.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Is theology respectable as metaphysics?Nicholaos Jones - 2008 - Zygon 43 (3):579-592.
    Theology involves inquiry into God's nature, God's purposes, and whether certain experiences or pronouncements come From God. These inquiries are metaphysical, part of theology's concern with the veridicality of signs and realities that are independent from humans. Several research programs concerned with the relation between theology and science aim to secure theology's intellectual standing as a metaphysical discipline by showing that it satisfies criteria that make modern science reputable, on the grounds that modern science embodies contemporary canons of respectability for (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Syncretism or correlation: Teilhard and Tillich's contrasting methodological approaches to science and theology.Michael W. DeLashmutt - 2005 - Zygon 40 (3):739-750.
    I revisit Paul Tillich's theological methodology and contrast his practice of correlation with the syncretistic methodological practices of Pierre Teilhard de Chardin. I argue that the method of correlation, as referred to in Robert John Russell's 2001 Zygon article, fails to uphold Tillich's self‐limitation of his own methodology with regard to Tillich's insistence upon the theological circle. I assert that the theological circle, as taken from Tillich's Systematic Theology I, is a central facet within his methodology and that this often‐ignored (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (1 other version)Models Clarified: Responding to Langdon Gilkey.David E. Klemm & William H. Klink - 2003 - Zygon 38 (3):535-541.
    We respond to concerns raised by Langdon Gilkey. The discussion addresses the nature of theological thinking today, the question of truth within the situation of pluralism, the identity and difference between theological models and scientific models, and the proposed methods for testing theological models.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark