Switch to: References

Citations of:

Basic Action Deontic Logic

In O. Roy, T. Allard & W. Malte (eds.), Deontic Logic and Normative Systems. College Publications. pp. 80-92 (2016)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Killing Gently by Means of the Śyena: The Navya-Nyāya Analysis of Vedic and Secular Injunctions (Vidhi) and Prohibitions (Niṣedha) From the Perspective of Dynamic Deontic Logic.Eberhard Guhe - forthcoming - Journal of Indian Philosophy:1-29.
    In the present paper we model the Navya-Nyāya analysis of Vedic and secular injunctions and prohibitions by means of Giordani’s and Canavotto’s system ADL of dynamic deontic logic. Navya-Naiyāyikas analyze the meaning of injunctions and prohibitions by reducing them to plain indicative statements about certain properties whose presence or absence in the enjoined or prohibited action serves as a criterion for the truth or falsity of the “inducing” or “restraining knowledge”, a kind of qualificative cognition instilled in the recipient of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • In Concreto Antinomies, Predictability, and Lawmaking.Guglielmo Feis - 2020 - Ratio Juris 33 (4):399-429.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Enriching Deontic Logic.Ilaria Canavotto & Alessandro Giordani - 2018 - Journal of Logic and Computation 1:1-23.
    It is well known that systems of action deontic logic emerging from a standard analysis of permission in terms of possibility of doing an action without incurring in a violation of the law are subject to paradoxes. In general, paradoxes are acknowledged as such if we have intuitions telling us that things should be different. The aim of this paper is to introduce a paradox-free deontic action system by (i) identifying the basic intuitions leading to the emergence of the paradoxes (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Supercover Semantics for Deontic Action Logic.Karl Nygren - 2019 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 28 (3):427-458.
    The semantics for a deontic action logic based on Boolean algebra is extended with an interpretation of action expressions in terms of sets of alternative actions, intended as a way to model choice. This results in a non-classical interpretation of action expressions, while sentences not in the scope of deontic operators are kept classical. A deontic structure based on Simons’ supercover semantics is used to interpret permission and obligation. It is argued that these constructions provide ways to handle various problems (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark