Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Systems biology and predictive neuroscience: A double helical approach.Harris Wiseman - 2017 - Zygon 52 (2):516-537.
    This article explores the overlap between systems biology and predictive neuroscience, placing them in their larger context, the contemporary trend of bioinformatic convergence across the sciences. These two domains overlap with respect to their interest in data accumulation and data integration; their reliance on computational statistical correlation; and their translational goals, that is, producing practical fruits and applications from the interscientific cross-pollination that contemporary data-integrative approaches make possible. The interventions that such translational conversations generate are medical and social in nature, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Don’t Ask a Neuroscientist about Phases of the Moon.Katherine Shats, Timothy Brindley & James Giordano - 2016 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 25 (4):712-725.
    Abstract:Ongoing developments in neuroscientific techniques and technologies—such as neuroimaging—offer potential for greater insight into human behavior and have fostered temptation to use these approaches in legal contexts. Neuroscientists are increasingly called on to provide expert testimony, interpret brain images, and thereby inform judges and juries who are tasked with determining the guilt or innocence of an individual. In this essay, we draw attention to the actual capabilities and limitations of currently available assessment neurotechnologies and examine whether neuroscientific evidence presents unique (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Rethinking psychiatry with OMICS science in the age of personalized P5 medicine: ready for psychiatome?Nicola Luigi Bragazzi - 2013 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 8:4.
    The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) is universally acknowledged as the prominent reference textbook for the diagnosis and assessment of psychiatric diseases. However, since the publication of its first version in 1952, controversies have been raised concerning its reliability and validity and the need for other novel clinical tools has emerged. Currently the DSM is in its fourth edition and a new fifth edition is expected for release in 2013, in an intense intellectual debate and in a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations